Higgins, John W. 1994. "Tracing the Vision: A Study of Community Volunteer Producers, Public Access Cable Television, and Empowerment." Dissertation. Ohio State U. Ann Arbor: UMI. 9517017.
All pages of this site copyright John W. Higgins 1994. Permission is granted to use these materials for non-commercial, educational purposes, with proper citation.
For a text version of Appendices. Not yet available.
CONTENTS:
Appendix A: Protocol for Group Interview
Appendix B: Protocol for Individual Interview
Appendix C: Coding Results: Informant "Talk" Scores
1. WHAT LED YOU TO FIRST GET INVOLVED WITH PUBLIC ACCESS TELEVISION?
2. THE EXPERIENCE WITH PUBLIC ACCESS THAT MOST STANDS OUT IN YOUR
MIND.
3. EXPERIENCES DURING TRAINING THAT STAND OUT IN YOUR MIND.
4. THOUGHTS ON THE VISION OF PUBLIC ACCESS
4. THOUGHTS ON THE VISION OF PUBLIC ACCESS
1. Public access is a First Amendment free speech forum
2. People making video programs become more critical media viewers. They better understand
the workings of the media in our society. Producers will create new, creative program styles.
3. People making video programs become more aware of themselves, other people, and society.
These producers are then better able to work for change in their lives and society.
Other people in public access argue with some of these ideas. They say that:
1. Not many people watch public access. What good is this First Amendment forum if no one is
watching?
2. Learning how to make video programs does not mean a producer becomes more critical of the
mainstream media, or how it operates in our society. Producers often just want to copy the way
programs are made in broadcast tv.
3. Learning how to make video programs does not mean a producer will look with a critical eye
at themselves, others, or society. It does not mean producers will attempt to change anything.
(Note: If you're interested, these discussions can be found most easily in the Community
Television Review. Copies and subscription information can be found at ACTV, If you're
looking for other places these discussions may be found, talk to John Higgins.)
Public Access TV Producer Group Interview
Date: _________
Your name: ____________ Name you'd like to use: ____________
A LITTLE INFORMATION ABOUT YOU
a. How many years of schooling have you had?
b. In what year were you born?
c. What is your sex?
d. How do you classify your race?
e. When you were growing up, what work did the main income earner in your family do? (In
other words, what kind of place did he or she work at, and what kind of job did he or she do?)
f. How would you classify your current work status, job, career, or current life's work?
g. Is it ok to use your image and comments as recorded on videotape today for educational
purposes?
_____ YES _____ NO
_____YES, BUT I have noted on the back of this sheet those segments I do
not want you to use.
Signed:
PROTOCOL FOR INDIVIDUAL INTERVIEW Name: ____________________
Date: ____________________
A. OVERALL:
1. PUBLIC ACCESS INVOLVEMENT
2. NUMBER OF SHOWS -- AS PRODUCER, AS CREW
B. MOMENTS:
THINK BACK TO A TIME WHEN YOU WERE WORKING ON A PROGRAM WHEN:
1. BEST EXPERIENCE
2. MOST DIFFICULT/ HARDEST/ WORST
3. YOU LOOKED AT THE TELEVISION INDUSTRY, OR SOCIETY AS A WHOLE, OR
TELEVISION PROGRAMS -- "DIFFERENTLY" [MORE CRITICALLY] THAN YOU DID
BEFORE YOU STARTED MAKING VIDEO PROGRAMS.
4. YOUR EFFORTS WITH PUBLIC ACCESS MADE SOME KIND OF "DIFFERENCE" IN
YOUR LIFE OR THE WORLD.
5. YOUR EFFORTS IN PUBLIC ACCESS WERE WASTED ENERGY.
6. PERSONAL VISION OF PUBLIC ACCESS? WHEN YOU SAW YOUR VISION OF
PUBLIC ACCESS WORKING WELL.
[LIST VISION--see sheet below]]
[REPEAT VISION--see sheet below]
NOW, LOOKING BACK AT YOUR ENTIRE EXPERIENCE WITH PUBLIC ACCESS
9. WHAT WOULD YOU SAY HAVE BEEN THE IMPACTS ON YOUR LIFE?
10. WHAT WOULD YOU SAY HAVE BEEN THE IMPACTS ON YOUR COMMUNITY?
11. WHAT WOULD YOU SAY HAVE BEEN THE IMPACTS ON COLUMBUS?
12. WHAT WOULD YOU SAY HAVE BEEN THE IMPACTS ON SOCIETY AS A WHOLE?
C. ENTIRE INTERVIEW
1. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
D. DEMOGRAPHICS
1. HOW MANY YEARS OF EDUCATION DO YOU HAVE?
2. IN WHAT YEAR WERE YOU BORN?
3. HOW DO YOU CLASSIFY YOUR RACE?
4. WHEN YOU WERE GROWING UP, WHAT WORK DID THE MAIN INCOME EARNER
IN YOUR FAMILY DO -- WHAT KIND OF PLACE DID HE OR SHE WORK AT AND
WHAT KIND OF JOB DID HE OR SHE DO?
5. WHAT IS YOUR SEX?
6. HOW WOULD YOU CLASSIFY YOUR CURRENT WORK STATUS, JOB, CAREER, OR
CURRENT LIFE'S WORK?
E. CLOSING COMMENTS
Name: _______________
Date: _______________
PROBES
P1a. IDEAS/CONCLUSIONS
P2a. FEELINGS/EMOTIONS
P3a. QUESTIONS/CONFUSIONS
P7a. HOW PROBES RELATED TO LIFE
P8a. ANY OTHER HAPPENINGS
#7 & #8 (above)
1. Public access is a First Amendment free speech forum
2. People making video programs become more critical media viewers. They better understand
the workings of the media in our society. Producers will create new, creative program styles.
3. People making video programs become more aware of themselves, other people, and society.
These producers are then better able to work for change in their lives and society.
Other people in public access argue with some of these ideas. They say that:
1. Not many people watch public access. What good is this First Amendment forum if no one is
watching?
2. Learning how to make video programs does not mean a producer becomes more critical of the
mainstream media, or how it operates in our society. Producers often just want to copy the way
programs are made in broadcast tv.
3. Learning how to make video programs does not mean a producer will look with a critical eye
at themselves, others, or society. It does not mean producers will attempt to change anything.
(Note: If you're interested, these discussions can be found most easily in the Community
Television Review. Copies and subscription information can be found at ACTV, If you're
looking for other places these discussions may be found, talk to John Higgins.)
Coding Results: Informant "Talk" Scores
Moderator's Protocol
--> Probe helps, hindrances: participant, community, society
--> Probe helps, hindrances: participant, community, society
(See attached sheet)
--> Probe helps, hindrances: participant, community, society
In part, the public access philosophy, or vision, says that:
Group #: _____
--->> probe
--->> probe
--->> describe program
--->> probe
--->> describe program
--->> probe
--->> describe program
--->> probe
--->> describe program
--->> probe
7. YOU SAW THE PUBLIC ACCESS VISION WORKING WELL/TOUCHED YOU
POSITIVELY.
--->> describe program
--->> probe
8. YOU SAW THE PUBLIC ACCESS VISION NOT WORKING WELL/TOUCHED YOU
NEGATIVELY.
--->> describe program
--->> probe
--->> describe impacts
--->> probe
--->> describe impacts
--->> probe
--->> describe impacts
--->> probe
--->> describe impacts
--->> probe
LOOKING BACK AT ALL OF THESE THINGS YOU MENTIONED --
IDEAS/CONCLUSIONS, FEELINGS/EMOTIONS, QUESTIONS/CONFUSIONS, HELPS,
HINDRANCES, AND HELPS WANTED -- THAT RELATE TO THIS MOMENT WHEN
_________________. HOW DID ALL OF THAT CONNECT WITH/RELATE TO YOUR
LIFE?
THOUGHTS ON THE VISION OF PUBLIC ACCESS
In part, the public access philosophy, or vision, says that:
AREAS <------------------------------------------------- EMPOWERMENT DOMAIN ---------------------------------------------->
OF | PRODUCTION | PERSONAL | SOCIETAL |
FOCUS | (in construction of video program) | (in own life) | (in power relations in society) |
|======================================================================================================================|
CANON |C/R:CHARLIE: 3 DENISE: 3 ALFRED: 2 |C/R:CHARLIE: 1 DENISE: 1 ALFRED: 1 |C/R:CHARLIE: 2 DENISE: 2 ALFRED: 0|
OF PROD | NOREEN: 2 MEREDITH: 2 | NOREEN: 1 MEREDITH: 2 | NOREEN: 2 MEREDITH: 1 |
| TOM: 3 DANIEL: 4 | TOM: 3 DANIEL: 4 | TOM: 1 DANIEL: 1 |
| THEA: 2 TRENT: 2 | THEA: 1 TRENT: 3 | THEA: 1 TRENT: 2 |
|---------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|
|A: CHARLIE: 2 DENISE: 2 ALFRED: 3 |A: CHARLIE: 1 DENISE: 2 ALFRED: 1|A: CHARLIE: 0 DENISE: 1 ALFRED: 0|
| NOREEN: 2 MEREDITH: 1 | NOREEN: 1 MEREDITH: 0 | NOREEN: 1 MEREDITH: 0 |
| TOM: 2 DANIEL: 3 | TOM: 2 DANIEL: 1 | TOM: 1 DANIEL: 0 |
| THEA: 3 TRENT: 1 | THEA: 1 TRENT: 0 | THEA: 1 TRENT: 0 |
=================================================================================================================================|
MEDIA |C/R:CHARLIE: 0 DENISE: 1 ALFRED: 3 |C/R:CHARLIE: 1 DENISE: 0 ALFRED: 2 |C/R:CHARLIE: 2 DENISE: 0 ALFRED: 1|
ORGANI- | NOREEN: 4 MEREDITH: 3 | NOREEN: 3 MEREDITH: 1 | NOREEN: 3 MEREDITH: 3 |
ZATION | TOM: 2 DANIEL: 1 | TOM: 1 DANIEL: 0 | TOM: 4 DANIEL: 2 |
| THEA: 1 TRENT: 1 | THEA: 0 TRENT: 1 | THEA: 1 TRENT: 4 |
|---------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|
|A: CHARLIE: 0 DENISE: 0 ALFRED: 0 |A: CHARLIE: 1 DENISE: 0 ALFRED: 1|A: CHARLIE: 1 DENISE: 0 ALFRED: 1|
| NOREEN: 1 MEREDITH: 0 | NOREEN: 0 MEREDITH: 0 | NOREEN: 1 MEREDITH: 1 |
| TOM: 1 DANIEL: 1 | TOM: 2 DANIEL: 0 | TOM: 0 DANIEL: 0 |
| THEA: 1 TRENT: 0 | THEA: 0 TRENT: 0 | THEA: 0 TRENT: 1 |
=================================================================================================================================|
NON-MEDIA |C/R:CHARLIE: 0 DENISE: 0 ALFRED: 2 |C/R:CHARLIE: 0 DENISE: 0 ALFRED: 0 |C/R:CHARLIE: 0 DENISE: 0 ALFRED: 0|
INSTITUT. | NOREEN: 1 MEREDITH: 1 | NOREEN: 0 MEREDITH: 1 | NOREEN: 3 MEREDITH: 3 |
RELATION- | TOM: 0 DANIEL: 0 | TOM: 0 DANIEL: 0 | TOM: 4 DANIEL: 2 |
SHIPS | THEA: 1 TRENT: 0 | THEA: 0 TRENT: 1 | THEA: 2 TRENT: 1 |
|---------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|
|A: CHARLIE: 0 DENISE: 0 ALFRED: 0 |A: CHARLIE: 0 DENISE: 0 ALFRED: 0|A: CHARLIE: 0 DENISE: 0 ALFRED: 0|
| NOREEN: 1 MEREDITH: 0 | NOREEN: 1 MEREDITH: 1 | NOREEN: 0 MEREDITH: 0 |
| TOM: 0 DANIEL: 0 | TOM: 0 DANIEL: 0 | TOM: 1 DANIEL: 0 |
| THEA: 0 TRENT: 0 | THEA: 0 TRENT: 0 | THEA: 0 TRENT: 1 |
=================================================================================================================================|
OTHERS |C/R:CHARLIE: 2 DENISE: 3 ALFRED: 2 |C/R:CHARLIE: 3 DENISE: 1 ALFRED: 3 |C/R:CHARLIE: 3 DENISE: 3 ALFRED: 0|
| NOREEN: 4 MEREDITH: 2 | NOREEN: 2 MEREDITH: 2 | NOREEN: 1 MEREDITH: 1 |
| TOM: 3 DANIEL: 1 | TOM: 3 DANIEL: 4 | TOM: 2 DANIEL: 3 |
| THEA: 1 TRENT: 3 | THEA: 3 TRENT: 3 | THEA: 3 TRENT: 2 |
|---------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|
|A: CHARLIE: 2 DENISE: 0 ALFRED: 2 |A: CHARLIE: 1 DENISE: 0 ALFRED: 1|A: CHARLIE: 1 DENISE: 0 ALFRED: 0|
| NOREEN: 1 MEREDITH: 0 | NOREEN: 0 MEREDITH: 0 | NOREEN: 1 MEREDITH: 0 |
| TOM: 1 DANIEL: 0 | TOM: 1 DANIEL: 1 | TOM: 1 DANIEL: 0 |
| THEA: 0 TRENT: 0 | THEA: 1 TRENT: 0 | THEA: 0 TRENT: 1 |
=================================================================================================================================|
SELF & |C/R:CHARLIE: 3 DENISE: 1 ALFRED: 2 |C/R:CHARLIE: 4 DENISE: 4 ALFRED: 1 |C/R:CHARLIE: 1 DENISE: 0 ALFRED: 0|
SELF LIFE | NOREEN: 0 MEREDITH: 0 | NOREEN: 1 MEREDITH: 1 | NOREEN: 0 MEREDITH: 0 |
| TOM: 1 DANIEL: 1 | TOM: 4 DANIEL: 2 | TOM: 0 DANIEL: 1 |
| THEA: 0 TRENT: 1 | THEA: 3 TRENT: 4 | THEA: 1 TRENT: 0 |
|---------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|
|A: CHARLIE: 1 DENISE: 0 ALFRED: 0 |A: CHARLIE: 0 DENISE: 0 ALFRED: 1|A: CHARLIE: 0 DENISE: 0 ALFRED: 0|
| NOREEN: 0 MEREDITH: 0 | NOREEN: 0 MEREDITH: 1 | NOREEN: 1 MEREDITH: 0 |
| TOM: 0 DANIEL: 0 | TOM: 1 DANIEL: 1 | TOM: 0 DANIEL: 0 |
| THEA: 1 TRENT: 0 | THEA: 0 TRENT: 0 | THEA: 0 TRENT: 1 |
==================================================================================================================================
4 = quite a few responses 1 = few responses
3 = many responses 0 = no response
2 = moderate amount of responses
-- end --
Return to the top of this document. Appendices.
Return to the starting page. "Tracing the Vision."
Return to the full Cover Pages and Table of Contents.
Return to Chapter 3: Methodology and Method.
Return to Chapter 4: Deductive Data Analysis.